Summary of Events
Causation of any historical event is disputed, especially over the long term events that led to it. While it’s easy to see what short term events led to the initiation of an event, the longer term causes are not as self-evident. In the case of the First World War, causes are a battleground for a wide number of historians. Some seek to empathise the role of leaders or parties, some seek to apportion blame to social issues or the development of capitalist imperialism, others yet see the arms race or the diplomatic events leading up to World War 1 as the key factors. This article will not pretend to have a clear answer to the question, but will present you with various events and theories and provide links for you to investigate them further for yourself to help you come to your own judgement.
Background – Setting the Scene
Relative shifts in world power
In 1914 Europe dominated the world. The metropols (capital cities of large powers) of Europe were the decision making centers of almost the entire globe. Events which happened here affected everywhere and thus a European war was bound to become a World War. Some non European countries were still significant powers in their own right, the USA especially which by 1914 produced more coal, steel and pig-iron than any one European country, but also Japan which had shown its might in the Russo-Japanese War in 1904-5. However the main empires of the world – including Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands were all within the continent and all had countries under their control elsewhere.
But the relative power of the European nations had changed considerably in the past years. Britain, once the unchallenged economic power of the world due to its early Industrial Revolution, had fallen relatively behind Germany in many key aspects. Germany now produced more pig-iron and steel that Britain, and was catching up on coal. The other powers were still considerably behind both, although Russia was fast expanding due to its size and government policies assisted by loans from other powers.
Growth of Empires
Imperialist expansion had increased greatly in the years following 1880. The ‘Scramble for Africa’, an attempt to gain new markets for products and new sources of raw materials and labour through the conquering of countries, involved many European countries – especially France and Britain, but also later Italy and Germany, as well as other powers such as Belgium and Portugal.
Imperialism did not always involved the direct rule but sometimes simply forcing favorable trading agreements on countries. The decline of the Chinese Empire led to European powers, as well as the USA and Japan exhorting these. This led to the Chinese revolting against the almost moribund rulers of the Manchu dynasty and setting up a republic in 1911.
Political systems of the powers
The nineteenth century had seen many countries adopt democratic forms of government. For most, this would not be recognisable today as democratic due to qualifications on suffrage meaning many working people, women and ethnic minorities (and other groups) were denied the vote or ability to stand for election. The extent that countries had adopted this form of government was varied. The USA, Britain and France all had democratic legislative bodies elected by the people, as had Germany. In Germany however despite the election of the lower house, the Reichstag, the power of this assembly was very limited compared with other parliaments and real power lay with the Chancellor and Kaiser. Italy and Japan too had limited forms of democratic government. Austro-Hungary and Russia however had strongly undemocratic regimes and are often labelled as autocratic with absolute rulers in the form of the Tsar of Russia and Emperor of Austro-Hungary. The parliaments that existed in these countries were explicitly there to give advice to the rulers, not to govern the country themselves. While the First World War is sometimes painted as a war for democracy, the presence of non-democratic regimes on both sides makes this claim false. This is especially true given that most of the ‘democratic’ powers held large empires which were denied the ability to either self-rule or participate in elections in the country that ruled them.
The Alliance System
Europe had divided itself into two Alliances. These had happened at different times, but the two main groups were the:
The Triple Alliance
- Germany
- Italy
- Austria-Hungary
The Triple Entente
- France
- Russia
- Britain
Japan and Britain also had an alliance dating from 1902.
Events causing deterioration of relations
- The loss of the Alsace-Lorraine region by France to Germany in the 1871 Franco-Prussian War.
- Naval rivalry between Britain and Germany, especially over battleships
- The ‘encirclement’ of Germany by the Triple Entente.
- The rivalry of the Balkans, especially Russian suspicions of Austria-Hungary expanding into them
- The relative failure of German empire building or Weltpolitik (translates as World Policy) which had gained them only small areas of Africa and the Pacific
- Serb nationalism, which led to a increase in tensions between Russia and Austro-Hungary
The Serbian Question
Serbia since 1882 had been ruled by King Milan, who had a pro-Austrian stance. His son, Alexander, had the same policy. This causes tension within Serbia as many nationalists saw Austria-Hungary as providing the greatest threat to independence. They especially hated the Treaty of Berlin of 1878 which allowed the Austro-Hungarian empire to annex Bosnia, an area which Serb nationalists saw a part of a Greater Serbia. Alexander was murdered by army officers in 1903 and replaced by Peter Karageorgevich. This led to a volte-face in Serbian policy towards an anti-Austrian, pro-Russian stance. The ambitions for a Greater Serbia or a Yugoslavia were now more explicitly stated, which was a threat to the Austro-Hungarian Empire which had many Serbs and Croats within its borders. If they were to loose these nationalities to a Yugoslavia, it is quite likely ethnic tensions in the Austro-Hungarian Empire would have increased and led to its collapse. This led the Habsburg empire of Austria-Hungary to consider a ‘preventative war’ against Serbia to prevent this outcome. Russia meanwhile supported their fellow Slavs in Serbia against Austria-Hungary. It was thus over this question that the war started in July 1914.
Footage of the aftermath of Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassination
First Events of World War 1
On the night of the 5th August 1914, Germany ordered five columns of assault troops, who just two days earlier had entered Belgium soil, to attack the town of Liège. While the command expected this to be an easy battle, the defenders of Liège fought back from forts near the town. This was the first set back in the strategy of quick assaults – the Germans needed to capture Liège in order to attack France - and the first indication that the war might not proceed as quickly as everyone expected. The Germans ordered heavy Howitzers to fire shells down on the forts to break through their armour plating. By the 13th the first fort had surrendered, and just three days later the entire town was in German hands.
Books
Video
How World War I Began
Can't find what you were looking for? Try searching our site:







